[1]赖婷婷.言语行为理论视域下的文学对人的塑造[J].福建工程学院学报,2019,17(05):483-487.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-4348.2019.05.013]
　LAI Tingting.Shaping of people by literature from the perspective of Speech Act Theory[J].Journal of FuJian University of Technology,2019,17(05):483-487.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-4348.2019.05.013]
点击复制

言语行为理论视域下的文学对人的塑造()
分享到：

《福建工程学院学报》[ISSN:2097-3853/CN:35-1351/Z]

卷:
第17卷
期数:
2019年05期
页码:
483-487
栏目:
出版日期:
2019-10-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
Shaping of people by literature from the perspective of Speech Act Theory
作者:
赖婷婷
闽南师范大学
Author(s):
LAI Tingting
School of Liberal Arts, Minnan Normal University
关键词:
言语行为; 文学言语行为; 以言取效; 塑造
Keywords:
speech act;  literary speech act;  perlocutionary act;  shaping
分类号:
I02
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1672-4348.2019.05.013
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
言语行为理论的核心观点是语言具有施行功能。文学虚构话语也具有以言行事的功能，即建构文学艺术世界。文学虚构话语对现实产生的影响，实际上就是文学以言行事产生的以言取效的言语行为，主要体现在读者和作者分别通过具有意向性的阅读和写作言语行为塑造了自身。作者在建构文学艺术世界中所展示的理想文化人格，在作者和读者的认可意向状态中形成的集体意向性，对两种主体的塑造发挥着重要作用。从言语行为理论角度探析文学虚构性话语如何塑造人，从而深入理解文学的现实功用。
Abstract:
The core point of the Speech Act Theory is that language has the function of doing things. The literary fictional discourse also has the function of doing things, that is, to construct the literary and artistic world. Its effects on reality are in fact the speech acts, i.e., the perlocutionary acts produced by illocutionary acts, which is mainly reflected in the fact that the reader and the author respectively shape themselves through such speech acts as intentional reading and writing. The ideal cultural personality displayed by the author in constructing the world of literature and art, and the collective intentionality formed in the state of authorized intentions of both the author and the reader, play an important role in shaping the two subjects. To explore how the literary fictional discourse can shape people from the perspective of the speech act theory can help deeply understand the practical function of literature.

参考文献/References:

[1] J.L.奥斯汀. 如何以言行事[M]. 杨玉成, 赵京超, 译. 北京: 商务印书馆, 2012.[2] 约翰·塞尔. 心灵、语言和社会: 实在世界中的哲学[M]. 李步楼, 译. 上海: 上海译文出版社, 2006.[3] 张瑜. 文学言语行为论研究[M]. 上海: 学林出版社, 2009.[4] 张瑜. 言语行为理论、可能世界理论与文学虚构问题[J]. 文学评论, 2017(1): 77-86.[5] 乔纳森·卡勒. 文学理论入门[M]. 李平, 译. 南京: 译林出版社, 2013.[6] 马大康. 社会规约: 文学的结构性要素[J]. 文艺理论研究, 2015, 34(3): 75-83.[7] 希利斯·米勒. 文学死了吗[M]. 秦立彦, 译. 桂林: 广西师范大学出版社, 2007: 29.[8] 黑塞. 德米安·彷徨少年时[M]. 林倩苇, 译. 北京: 中国法制出版社, 2015: 158.[9] 沈金耀. 文化诗学之文本解读[M]. 北京: 中国社会科学出版社, 2016: 108.[10] 史铁生. 病隙碎笔[M]. 长沙: 湖南文艺出版社, 2017: 91.

相似文献/References:

[1]陈启庆.从言语行为的角度看中国故事的国际言说策略[J].福建工程学院学报,2019,17(02):188.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-4348.2019.02.015]
　CHEN Qiqing.On the discourse strategies of Chinese stories in international communication from the perspective of speech acts[J].Journal of FuJian University of Technology,2019,17(05):188.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-4348.2019.02.015]

更新日期/Last Update: 2019-10-25