[1]陈哲.考虑社会责任主体差异的供应链绿色创新决策[J].福建工程学院学报,2021,19(04):391-400.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-4348.2021.04.014]
　CHEN Zhe.Green innovation decision-making of supply chain enterprises considering the difference of social responsibility undertakers[J].Journal of FuJian University of Technology,2021,19(04):391-400.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-4348.2021.04.014]
点击复制

考虑社会责任主体差异的供应链绿色创新决策()
分享到：

《福建工程学院学报》[ISSN:2097-3853/CN:35-1351/Z]

卷:
第19卷
期数:
2021年04期
页码:
391-400
栏目:
出版日期:
2021-08-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
Green innovation decision-making of supply chain enterprises considering the difference of social responsibility undertakers
作者:
陈哲
福建工程学院管理学院
Author(s):
CHEN Zhe
School of Management, Fujian University of Technology
关键词:
绿色创新; 社会责任行为; 承担主体差异; 供应链企业
Keywords:
green innovation;  social responsibility behavior;  undertaker difference;  supply chain enterprises
分类号:
F224
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1672-4348.2021.04.014
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
绿色创新是我国实现经济社会绿色转型的必然要求，企业绿色创新决策与社会责任水平存在关联，供应链中社会责任承担主体差异将影响企业绿色创新决策。构建一个二级供应链模型，考察承担主体差异对制造商绿色创新决策的作用机制，探究各影响因素对决策结果的影响，研究发现:供应链主体社会责任承担情况将影响制造商绿色创新，各方社会责任分担比例与各情形下绿色创新投入、双方效用正向相关；制造商与零售商双方共担社会责任下的绿色创新水平将优于单方承担社会责任情形，两类单方承担情形下的绿色创新水平大小关系与双方社会责任承担比例间的数量关系有关；消费者绿色偏好与制造商绿色创新投入、双方效用、零售价格与批发价格正向关联，消费者价格敏感度则与上述变量反向关联。提出相关策略建议，以期为供应链企业绿色创新促进提供有益参考。
Abstract:
Green innovation is an inevitable requirement for China to realize the green transformation of economy and society. The green innovation decision-making is correlated with the level of social responsibility of enterprises and the difference of social responsibility undertakers in the supply chain will affect the green innovation decision-making of enterprises. A two-level supply chain model was constructed to investigate the influence mechanism of undertakers’ difference on manufacturer’s green innovation decision-making, and then explore the influence of various factors on the decision-making results. Results show that: (1) the social responsibility of the supply chain enterprises will affect the manufacturer’s green innovation, and the proportion of social responsibility of all parties is positively related to the green innovation input and the utility of manufacturer and retailer; (2)the level of green innovation under the social responsibility shared by both manufacturers and retailers will be higher than that under the situation of unilateral sharing of social responsibility; the relationship between the level of green innovation under two kinds of unilateral sharing conditions is related to the quantitative relationship between manufacturers’ social responsibility sharing proportion and retailer’ sharing proportion; (3)consumers’ green preference is positively correlated with manufacturers’ green innovation input, utility of manufacturer and retailer, retail price and wholesale price, while consumers’ price sensitivity is negatively correlated with the above variables. Some relevant strategies are put forward in order to provide useful reference for the promotion of green innovation in supply chain enterprises.

参考文献/References:

[1] 曹洪军, 陈泽文. 内外环境对企业绿色创新战略的驱动效应：高管环保意识的调节作用[J]. 南开管理评论, 2017, 20（6）：95-103.[2] 解学梅, 王若怡, 霍佳阁. 政府财政激励下的绿色工艺创新与企业绩效：基于内容分析法的实证研究[J]. 管理评论, 2020, 32（5）：109-124.[3] 王珍愚, 曹瑜, 林善浪. 环境规制对企业绿色技术创新的影响特征与异质性：基于中国上市公司绿色专利数据[J]. 科学学研究, 2021, 39（5）：909-919, 929.[4] 毛蕴诗, 王婧. 企业社会责任融合、利害相关者管理与绿色产品创新：基于老板电器的案例研究[J]. 管理评论, 2019, 31（7）：149-161.[5] KIEFER C P, CARRILLO-HERMOSILLA J, DEL RO P, et al. Diversity of eco-innovations：aquantitative approach[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2017, 166：1494-1506.[6] COOK K A, ROMI A M, SNCHEZ D, et al. The influence of corporate social responsibility on investment efficiency and innovation[J]. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 2019, 46（3/4）：494-537.[7] DEWICK P, FOSTER C. Focal organisations and eco-innovation in consumption and production systems[J]. Ecological Economics, 2018, 143：161-169.[8] BOCQUET R, LEBAS C, MOTHE C, et al. CSR, innovation, and firm performance in sluggish growth contexts：afirm-level empirical analysis[J]. Journal of Business Ethics, 2017, 146（1）：241-254.[9] 陈钰芬, 金碧霞, 任奕. 企业社会责任对技术创新绩效的影响机制：基于社会资本的中介效应[J]. 科研管理, 2020, 41（9）：87-98.[10] 阳镇, 凌鸿程, 陈劲. 经济政策不确定性、企业社会责任与企业技术创新[J]. 科学学研究, 2021, 39（3）：544-555.[11] 肖小虹, 潘也, 王站杰. 企业履行社会责任促进了企业绿色创新吗[J/OL].经济经纬. https:∥doi.org/10.15931/j.cnki.1006-1096.20210324.001.[12] 龚晨, 毕克新. 低碳情境下制造企业社会责任对创新绩效的影响研究[J]. 预测, 2018, 37（1）：43-48.[13] 杨冬云, 谢杨. 企业社会责任、绿色创新能力与企业环境绩效[J]. 财会通讯, 2019（6）：100-104.[14] 柏群, 杨云. 组织冗余资源对绿色创新绩效的影响：基于社会责任的中介作用[J]. 财经科学, 2020（12）：96-106.[15] PANDA S. Coordination of a socially responsible supply chain using revenue sharing contract[J]. Transportation Research Part E：Logistics and Transportation Review, 2014, 67：92-104.[16] 范建昌, 倪得兵, 唐小我. 企业社会责任与供应链产品质量选择及协调契约研究[J]. 管理学报, 2017, 14（9）：1374-1383.[17] BISWAS I, RAJ A, SRIVASTAVA S K. Supply chain channel coordination with triple bottom line approach[J]. Transportation Research Part E：Logistics and Transportation Review, 2018, 115：213-226.[18] 林志炳, 陈莫凡. 基于企业社会责任的绿色制造策略及供应链协调[J]. 计算机集成制造系统, 2020, 26（11）：3108-3117.[19] PANDA S, MODAK N M, CRDENAS-BARRN L E. Coordinating a socially responsible closed-loop supply chain with product recycling[J]. International Journal of Production Economics, 2017, 188：11-21.[20] 公彦德, 陈梦泽. 考虑企业社会责任和公平偏好的绿色供应链决策研究[J/OL].控制与决策. https:∥doi.org/10.13195/j.kzyjc.2019.1102.

更新日期/Last Update: 2021-08-25