[1]方金城、赵琛、林丽端.竞争战略对标杆学习与双元创新关系研究[J].福建工程学院学报,2020,18(06):604-612.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-4348.2020.06.017]
　FANG Jincheng,ZHAO Chen,LIN Liduan.Research on the relationship between benchmarking and ambidextrous innovation 〖JZ〗under the moderation of the competitive strategy[J].Journal of FuJian University of Technology,2020,18(06):604-612.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-4348.2020.06.017]
点击复制

竞争战略对标杆学习与双元创新关系研究()
分享到：

《福建工程学院学报》[ISSN:2097-3853/CN:35-1351/Z]

卷:
第18卷
期数:
2020年06期
页码:
604-612
栏目:
出版日期:
2020-12-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
Research on the relationship between benchmarking and ambidextrous innovation 〖JZ〗under the moderation of the competitive strategy
作者:
方金城、赵琛、林丽端
福建工程学院管理学院
Author(s):
FANG Jincheng1;  ZHAO Chen1;  LIN Liduan
School of Transportation, Fujian University of Technology
关键词:
竞争战略; 标杆学习; 双元创新; 调节效应
Keywords:
competitive strategy;  benchmarking;  ambidextrous innovation;  moderating effect
分类号:
F270
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1672-4348.2020.06.017
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
建构了不同竞争战略下标杆学习对企业主流与新流双元创新影响关系的理论模型，对福建、广东和浙江三省生产型制造企业进行较大规模的问卷调查，对上述理论模型进行实证分析和拟合检验。实证研究表明，标杆学习对企业主流与新流双元创新均有显著性的正向影响，组织惯例更新是标杆学习促进企业双元创新的重要中介。成本领先战略正向调节标杆学习和企业主流技术创新的影响关系，而差异化战略则对上述二者关系的调节效应不明显?成本领先战略和差异化战略对标杆学习和企业新流技术创新影响关系的调节作用分别是负向和正向的，且调节效应也截然不同。研究对企业在不同竞争战略下合理制定标杆学习策略，提升主流与新流双元创新成效具有一定的借鉴意义。
Abstract:
A theoretical model was constructed of the relationship between benchmarking and the ambidexterity (mainstream & newstream) innovation of enterprises under different competitive strategies. Empirical analysis and fitting test on the above theoretical model were conducted through large-scale questionnaire surveys of manufacturing enterprises in Fujian, Guangdong and Zhejiang provinces. The results of statistical empirical analysis show that benchmarking has a significant positive impact on both the mainstream and new-stream technical innovation of enterprises, and organizational routine update is an important intermediary for benchmarking to promote enterprise ambidexterity innovation. The cost leadership strategy positively moderates the relationship between benchmarking and mainstream technical innovation of enterprises, while the differentiation strategy does not moderate the relationship significantly. The moderating effect of cost leadership strategy and differentiation strategy on the relationship between benchmarking and new-stream technical innovation of enterprises is negative and positive respectively, and their moderating effects are entirely different. This study provides useful reference for enterprises to formulate benchmarking strategies reasonably under different competitive strategies and improve the effectiveness of enterprises’ ambidexterity innovation.

参考文献/References:

[1] BEREZNOY A. Changing competitive landscape through business model innovation: the new imperative for corporate market strategy[J]. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 2019, 10（4）: 1362-1383. [2] 朱斌, 陈艳华, 陈丽霞. 企业主流与新流创新演进机理研究: 中兴通讯和无锡尚德创新演进案例分析[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2018, 35（1）: 88-95. [3] GONCHARUK A. Competitive benchmarking technique for “the followers”: a case of Ukrainian dairies[J]. Benchmarking: an International Journal, 2014, 21（2）: 218-225. [4] REY J, GALVEZ D, MOREL L, et al. Benchmarking innovation: comparison of industrial SMEs in Argentine and France[J]. International Journal of Management & Information Technology, 2013, 3（1）: 102-121. [5] 雍颜, 陈劲. 企业技术创新的高标准定位研究[J]. 科研管理, 2001, 22（1）: 79-85. [6] FLORN H, FRISHAMMAR J, PARIDA V, et al. Critical success factors in early new product development: a review and a conceptual model[J]. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 2018, 14（2）: 411-427. [7] MOREIRA S, TAE C. The effect of industry leaders’ exploratory innovation on competitor performance[J]. Industry and Innovation, 2019, 26（9）: 965-987. [8] 魏龙, 党兴华. 惯例跨期性耦合与迭代创新: 被调节的中介效应[J]. 科学学研究, 2018, 36（5）: 933-945. [9] TUNCDOGAN A, BOON A, MOM T, et al. Management teams’ regulatory foci and organizational units’ exploratory innovation: The mediating role of coordination mechanisms[J]. Long Range Planning, 2017, 50（5）: 621-635. [10] DOBNI C. The relationship between an innovation orientation and competitive strategy[J]. International Journal of Innovation Management, 2010, 14（2）: 331-357. [11] DUANMU J, BU M, RUSSELL P. Does market competition dampen environmental performance？Evidence from China[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2018, 7（4）: 14-23.[12] FENDI S. The relationship between quality, benchmarking, reliability and globalization in industrial engineering activity[J]. Engineering & Technology Journal, 2012, 30（17）: 3065-3081.[13] 方金城, 朱斌. 标杆学习对企业主流与新流创新的影响[J]. 中国流通经济, 2016, 30（1）: 104-113. [14] 邓昕才, 潘枭骁, 叶一娇. 跨界搜索、组织惯例更新、管理创新及组织绩效关系[J]. 贵州社会科学, 2017（8）: 96-102. [15] 刘建伟, 吴剑琳, 古继宝. 创业自我效能与机会识别: 创业教育的调节效应分析[J]. 科技管理研究, 2018, 38（12）: 210-216. [16] INVERNIZZI D, LOCATELLI G, BROOKES N. A methodology based on benchmarking to learn across megaprojects: the case of nuclear decommissioning[J]. Social Science Electronic Publishing, 2018, 11（3）: 128-139.[17] KHARUB M, MOR R, SHARMA R. The relationship between cost leadership competitive strategy and firm performance[J]. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 2019, 30（6）: 920-936. [18] BRAKAJ E P, VASILIKA K, AMALI C. The impact of generic competitive strategies on organizational performance: the evidence from albanian context[J]. European Scientific Journal, 2015, 11（28）: 273-284.

更新日期/Last Update: 2020-12-25