[1]杨亿力.“立则”和“开道”：宋初行卷古文的两种倾向[J].福建工程学院学报,2020,18(02):198-204.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-4348.2020.02.017]
　YANG Yili.“Establishing political principles” and “becoming a saint”：two tendencies in ancient prose writing of candidates’ volumes in the early Song Dynasty[J].Journal of FuJian University of Technology,2020,18(02):198-204.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-4348.2020.02.017]
点击复制

“立则”和“开道”：宋初行卷古文的两种倾向()
分享到：

《福建工程学院学报》[ISSN:2097-3853/CN:35-1351/Z]

卷:
第18卷
期数:
2020年02期
页码:
198-204
栏目:
出版日期:
2020-04-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
“Establishing political principles” and “becoming a saint”：two tendencies in ancient prose writing of candidates’ volumes in the early Song Dynasty
作者:
杨亿力
福建工程学院人文学院（地方文献整理研究中心）
Author(s):
YANG Yili
Local Literature Research Center, Fujian University of Technology
关键词:
“立则”; “开道”; 宋初; 行卷古文; 倾向
Keywords:
“establishing political principles”;  “becoming a saint”;  the early Song Dynasty;  ancient prose writing of candidates’ volumes;  tendency
分类号:
I206
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1672-4348.2020.02.017
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
宋初的行卷古文存在“立则”和“开道”两种倾向。前者以王禹偁等人为代表，他们的古文多以“六经”为准的，试图为君臣定制定行为准则，展现出欲为帝王师的姿态。后者以柳开、张扶等为代表，试图希望以古文言说天地之道及仁义礼智信等“儒行”，继而使自己的古文获得与“六经”同等的地位甚至超越“六经”，达到成为“圣人”的目的。张扶等士子抱有“言天地之理不当使人易度易揣测”的想法，力图以古涩之语生成深奥的意义。把握这两种倾向，对于今人窥视当时的文坛以及理解“传道明心”等古文理论有着一定的意义。
Abstract:
In the early Song Dynasty, there were two tendencies, namely “establishing political principles” and “becoming a saint”, in ancient prose writings of candidates’ volumes. The former was represented by Wang Yucheng, whose ancient prose writings were mostly based on the “Six Classics”. He tried to set rules for Chinese monarchs and ministers and showed the attitude of wanting to be the monarch’s teacher. The latter, represented by Liu Kai and Zhang Fu, tried to expound not only the Confucian way but also the behavior which was in line with Confucian norms. Their purpose was to give their ancient prose writings the same status of the “Six Classics” and even surpass them, so that they themselves can become saints. In Zhangfu’s opinion, authors should use the classical and inscrutable language to generate profound implications because the language used to expound the Confucian way should not be readily comprehensible. Grasping these two tendencies will help us further understand the connotation of some literary theories such as “transmitting the Confucian way and clearifying the heart” at that time.

参考文献/References:

[1] 王乃宁. 北宋初年的行卷风尚和古文复兴[J]. 学术月刊, 2004, 36(12): 97-100, 87. [2] 东英寿. 复古与创新：欧阳修散文与古文复兴[M]. 上海: 上海古籍出版社, 2005.[3] 王禹偁. 小畜集[M]. 上海: 上海涵芬楼影印本.[4] 曾枣庄, 刘琳. 全宋文[M]. 上海: 上海辞书出版社, 2006.[5] 北京大学古文献研究所. 全宋诗[M]. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 1999.[6] 脱脱. 宋史[M]. 北京: 中华书局, 1976.[7] 池泽滋子. 丁谓研究[M]. 成都: 巴蜀书社, 1998. [8] 柳开, 李可风. 柳开集[M]. 北京: 中华书局, 2015.[9] 祝尚书. 北宋古文运动发展史[M]. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2012. [10] 何寄澎. 北宋的古文运动[M]. 上海: 上海古籍出版社, 2011. [11] 田锡, 罗国威. 咸平集[M]. 成都: 巴蜀书社, 2008.

更新日期/Last Update: 2019-04-25