[1]黄晓娟.独立担保欺诈例外的适用——以《最高人民法院关于审理独立保函纠纷案件若干问题的规定》为视角[J].福建工程学院学报,2018,16(05):490-494.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-4348.2018.05.015]
　HUANG XiaoJuan.Application of independent guarantee fraud exceptions:from the perspective of the “Provisions of the Supreme People’s Court on Several Issues Concerning the Trial of Independent Guarantees Dispute Cases”[J].Journal of FuJian University of Technology,2018,16(05):490-494.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-4348.2018.05.015]
点击复制

独立担保欺诈例外的适用——以《最高人民法院关于审理独立保函纠纷案件若干问题的规定》为视角()
分享到：

《福建工程学院学报》[ISSN:2097-3853/CN:35-1351/Z]

卷:
第16卷
期数:
2018年05期
页码:
490-494
栏目:
出版日期:
2018-10-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
Application of independent guarantee fraud exceptions:from the perspective of the “Provisions of the Supreme People’s Court on Several Issues Concerning the Trial of Independent Guarantees Dispute Cases”
作者:
黄晓娟
福州大学法学院
Author(s):
HUANG XiaoJuan
Law School, Fuzhou University
关键词:
独立担保;  欺诈例外;  诚信原则;  显失公平
Keywords:
independent guarantee;  fraud exceptions;  principle of good faith;  obvious unfairness
分类号:
D996
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1672-4348.2018.05.015
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
我国2016年出台的《最高人民法院关于审理独立保函纠纷案件若干问题的规定》（以下简称《规定》），其中欺诈例外条款仍存在对欺诈认定标准的模糊界定、当事人排除适用该条款的规定不清及没有明确规定反担保的适用等问题。国外欺诈例外认定标准从主客观分类到以单据原因分类，限制基础合同对欺诈例外的无限影响，将第三人欺诈例外和受益人主观形态综合考量，我国《规定》第十二条在具体内容细化上可以对此进行借鉴。我国应当坚持修正受益人欺诈的理论，并遵从欺诈例外的法理内涵，认可当事人对排除欺诈例外的有限适用，并将欺诈例外的规定准用于反
Abstract:
In the “Provisions of the Supreme People’s Court on Several Issues Concerning the Trial of Independent Guaranty Disputes” (hereinafter referred to as the “Provisions”) issued in 2016, there are still some problems with the fraudulent exception clause, such as a vague definition of the criteria for fraudulent identification, and the ambiguity in the parties’ exclusion from the application of this clause and the lack of clear provisions on the application of counter|guarantees. The classification of fraud exception identification criteria abroad went from subjective and objective categories to that based on documents, limiting the unlimited impact of basic contracts on fraud exceptions, considering the exception of third party fraud and the subjective form of the beneficiary. The above|mentioned can provide reference for further detailed interpretation of Article 12 of the “Regulations”. China should insist on amending the theory of beneficiary fraud, comply with the legal connotation of the fraud exception, approve the limited application of the parties to the exclusion of fraud exceptions, and apply the provisions of the fraud exception to the counter|guarantee.

参考文献/References:

[1] 陆璐. 独立保函国内适用难题研究: 以信用证欺诈例外规则的引入为视角[J]. 苏州大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2014, 35(6): 84-92.
[2] GAO X, BUCKLEY R P. A comparative analysis of standard of fraud required under the fraud rule in letter of credit law[J]. Duke Journal of Comparative & International Law, 2003(13): 293-336.
[3] 刘斌. 独立担保欺诈例外的类型化: 兼评我国独立保函司法解释征求意见稿[J]. 比较法研究, 2014(5): 123-135.
[4] 张德新, 袁玲. 信用证欺诈例外原则对第三方的适用与豁免[J]. 经营与管理, 2008(9): 46-47.
[5] 耿小宁, 杨泽宇. 受益人欺诈性索款构成银行独立保函独立性的例外[J]. 人民司法, 2014(12): 47-51.
[6] 刘斌. 独立担保: 一个概念的界定[J]. 清华法学, 2016, 10(1): 127-141.
[7] 刘斌. 论独立担保的修正类型谱系: 兼评最高人民法院独立保函司法解释[J]. 法学杂志, 2017, 38(12): 69-79.
[8] 刘亮, 田德鹏. 反担保与担保的关系探讨[J]. 郑州航空工业管理学院学报(社会科学版), 2006(5): 113-114, 117.

更新日期/Last Update: 2018-10-25