[1]李婷婷,刘东江.合理定价评审抽取法负面效应及优化建议[J].福建工程学院学报,2018,16(05):479-483.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-4348.2018.05.013]
 LI Tingting,LIU Dongjiang.Negative effects and optimization suggestions of extraction method of reasonable pricing review[J].Journal of FuJian University of Technology,2018,16(05):479-483.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-4348.2018.05.013]
点击复制

合理定价评审抽取法负面效应及优化建议()
分享到:

《福建工程学院学报》[ISSN:2097-3853/CN:35-1351/Z]

卷:
第16卷
期数:
2018年05期
页码:
479-483
栏目:
出版日期:
2018-10-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
Negative effects and optimization suggestions of extraction method of reasonable pricing review
作者:
李婷婷刘东江
武夷学院土木工程与建筑学院
Author(s):
LI TingtingLIU Dongjiang
School of Civil Engineering, Wuyi University
关键词:
招投标随机抽取负面效应有序竞争
Keywords:
bidding random sampling negative effects orderly competition
分类号:
TU723.2
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1672-4348.2018.05.013
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
工程招投标市场在近十年呈快速动态发展,静态的法规不可能恒定地全面符合其发展,因此一些地区政府在招投标工作中试行了合理定价评审抽取法。该办法适当简化了评标程序,易于操作,但同时也促使一些企业出现了靠概率和运气生存、降低了企业整体能动力等负面作用。该办法需要经历动态的试用和自我调整与完善,使其更合理有效地发挥优胜劣汰的市场竞争机制,促使招投标工作更优质地服务于工程市场。
Abstract:
The market for engineering bidding has developed rapidly in the last ten years. The static laws cannot always be fully consistent with its development. Therefore, some regional governments have tried the method of reasonable pricing and random extraction to determine the winning bidder in the bidding work. This method, being easy to operate, properly simplifies the bid evaluation procedure, but at the same time, it also prompts some enterprises to rely on probability and luck to survive, reducing the overall power of the enterprise while bringing other negative effects. This method needs to go through dynamic trial and self-adjustment and perfection, so that it can play more reasonably and effectively in the market competition mechanism of the survival of the fittest, and make the bidding work better serve the engineering market.

参考文献/References:

[1] 韩涛, 范炳杰. 评标办法在工程招标中的选择和应用[J]. 公路, 2014(8): 109-110.
[2] 王将军. 评标办法对投标报价行为的影响与分析[J]. 建筑技术, 2015, S1(46): 35-38.

更新日期/Last Update: 2018-10-25