[1]张胜璋.论林纾与古文理论的终结[J].福建理工大学学报,2024,22(02):114-121.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.2097-3853.2024.02.003]
　ZHANG Shengzhang.On Lin Shu and the ending of ancient prose theory[J].Journal of Fujian University of Technology;,2024,22(02):114-121.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.2097-3853.2024.02.003]
点击复制

论林纾与古文理论的终结()
分享到：

《福建理工大学学报》[ISSN:2097-3853/CN:35-1351/Z]

卷:
第22卷
期数:
2024年02期
页码:
114-121
栏目:
出版日期:
2024-04-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
On Lin Shu and the ending of ancient prose theory
作者:
张胜璋
闽江学院
Author(s):
ZHANG Shengzhang
School of Humanities, Minjiang University
关键词:
林纾; 古文理论; 意境; 取法; 新学; 终结
Keywords:
Lin Shu;  ancient prose theory;  artistic conception;  methods;  new learning;  ending
分类号:
I046
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.2097-3853.2024.02.003
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
林纾生逢封建王朝末世,其所论古文,上至先秦,近及清代,梳理诸多概念范畴、渊源流别以至文法技巧,留下数量繁多、见识精到的理论著作与评点文选,形成了一套比较完整的古文理论体系,堪称古文理论的“终结”,为中国古文理论的现代转换研究增添了新的实证材料和思想资源。林纾主张博采众长、取法乎上,对桐城派的散文理论而言,其审视与超越的功绩要大于继承与整合。林纾翻译西洋小说并撰写大量序跋作品,强调文学对普通人生、下等社会的关照,主张“于布帛粟米中述情”,参与了中国传统文论的现代化进程。林纾对古文的执守,虽有复古与偏执的弊病,为“ 五四” 后新文化潮流所摒弃,但也有保全国学、传承文化的合理意见和有益思考,值得当今学术界借鉴与反思。
Abstract:
Born at the end of the feudal dynasty, Lin Shu explored ancient Chinese prose from the pre-Qin period to the Qing Dynasty, and sorted out many conceptual categories, origins and even grammar skills, leaving a large number of insightful theoretical works and commentaries, forming a relatively complete theoretical system of ancient prose, which can be called the “ending” of ancient prose theory, and adding new empirical materials and ideological resources to the modern transformation research of Chinese ancient prose theory. Lin Shu advocated learning from others and taking the best methods. As far as the prose theory of the Tongcheng school was concerned, his achievements of examination and transcendence were greater than those of inheritance and integration. Lin Shu translated Western novels and wrote a large number of preface and postscript works, emphasizing the attention of literature to ordinary life and the lower society, advocating “expressing feelings in details of daily life”, thereby participating in the modernization process of traditional Chinese literary theory. Although Lin Shu’s adherence to ancient prose had the disadvantages of restoring ancient ways and being paranoid, which was abandoned by the new cultural trend after the May 4th movement, he also had reasonable opinions and useful thoughts on preserving traditional Chinese studies and inheriting culture, which are worthy of reference and reflection by the academic circles today.

参考文献/References:

［1］ 梁启超. 科学精神与东西文化［M］∥饮冰室合集·文集5·饮冰室文集之三十九. 北京：中华书局，2015：1.［2］ 王国维. 教育小言［M］∥王国维遗书（五）. 上海：上海书店出版社，1983:53.［3］ 钱基博. 现代中国文学史［M］. 上海：上海书店出版社，2004. ［4］ 曾宪辉. 林纾［M］. 沈阳：春风文艺出版社，1999：67. ［5］ 张俊才. 林纾评传［M］. 北京：中华书局，2007.［6］ 张胜璋. 林纾古文论综论［M］. 厦门：厦门大学出版社，2007.［7］ 李瑶. 论文偶记·附录·序［M］∥刘大櫆. 论文偶记. 北京：人民文学出版社，1998:15.［8］ 慈波. 《文学研究法》：桐城派文章理论的总结［J］. 江淮论坛，2007（5）: 155-159, 60.［9］ 钱钟书. 读《拉奥孔》［M］∥钱钟书. 七缀集. 上海：上海古籍出版社，1985:29.［10］ 林纾. 论古文白话之相消长［M］∥郑振铎. 中国新文学大系二集. 上海：良友总公司，1935：80.［11］ 林纾. 韩柳文研究法［M］. 上海：商务印书馆，1915:48.［12］ 林纾. 《爱国二童子传》达旨［M］∥林琴南书话. 杭州：浙江人民出版社，1999.［13］ 寒光. 林琴南［M］. 上海：中华书局，1935：220. ［14］ 林纾. 春觉斋论文［M］. 北京：人民文学出版，1959.［15］ 胡经之. 中国古典文艺学［M］. 北京：光明日报出版社，2006：373.［16］ 林纾. 赠马通伯先生序［M］∥林纾. 畏庐续集： 民国丛书第四编94. 上海：上海书店，1992.［17］ 郭立志. 桐城吴先生（汝纶）年谱［M］∥近代中国史料丛刊725. 台北：文海出版社，1972：325.［18］ 方苞. 又书《货殖传》后［M］∥贾文昭. 桐城派文论选. 北京：中华书局，2008.［19］ 林纾. 桐城派古文说［M］∥李家骥, 李茂肃， 薛祥生. 林纾诗文选. 北京：商务印书馆，1993.［20］ 吴德旋. 初月楼古文绪论［M］. 北京：人民文学出版，1998：19.［21］ 林纾. 畏庐文集： 民国丛书第四编94［M］. 上海：上海书店，1992.［22］ 林纾. 庄子浅说［M］. 台北：广文书局有限公司，1978：1.［23］ 钱钟书. 林纾的翻译［M］. 北京：商务印书馆，1981：28.［24］ 吴士余. 中国文化与小说思维［M］. 上海：上海三联书店，2000：89.［25］ 谭君强. 叙述学导论［M］. 北京：高等教育出版社，2008：16.［26］ 林纾. 洪嫣篁［M］∥林薇. 林纾选集·小说卷: 上. 成都：四川人民出版社，1986.［27］ 胡适. 五十年来中国之文学［M］∥胡适文存：二集. 合肥：黄山书社，1996：197.［28］ 章太炎. 与人论文书［M］∥马勇. 章太炎书信集. 石家庄：河北人民出版社，2003：287.［29］ 周振甫. 古代文论二十三讲［M］. 重庆：重庆大学出版社，2010：208.

相似文献/References:

[1]林东源.林纾与陈衍[J].福建理工大学学报,2014,12(02):111.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-4348.2014.02.003]
　Lin Dongyuan.Lin Shu and Chen Yan[J].Journal of Fujian University of Technology;,2014,12(02):111.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-4348.2014.02.003]
[2]卢仁龙.画坛又谱广陵散——林纾书画艺术论[J].福建理工大学学报,2014,12(05):409.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-4348.2014.05.001]
　Lu Renlong.The rebirth of Guangling verse in painting field: On Lin Shu’s painting and calligraphy[J].Journal of Fujian University of Technology;,2014,12(02):409.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-4348.2014.05.001]
[3]吴毓鸣.论林纾的文学修为[J].福建理工大学学报,2014,12(05):415.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-4348.2014.05.002]
　Wu Yuming.On Lin Shu’s literary accomplishments[J].Journal of Fujian University of Technology;,2014,12(02):415.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-4348.2014.05.002]
[4]黄锦珠.林译言情小说《巴黎茶花女遗事》的日常性[J].福建理工大学学报,2014,12(05):425.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-4348.2014.05.004]
　Huang Jinzhu.Everyday life of “La Traviata Heritage in Paris”, a love novel translated by Lin Shu[J].Journal of Fujian University of Technology;,2014,12(02):425.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-4348.2014.05.004]
[5]吴仁华,郭丹.林纾的文化品格与大学文化建设[J].福建理工大学学报,2015,13(02):103.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-4348.2015.02.001]
　Wu Renhua,Guo Dan.The cultural quality of Lin Shu and the construction of college culture[J].Journal of Fujian University of Technology;,2015,13(02):103.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-4348.2015.02.001]
[6]祁开龙,庄林丽.从林译序跋看林纾的爱国情怀[J].福建理工大学学报,2015,13(02):109.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-4348.2015.02.002]
　Qi Kailong,Zhuang Linli.The patriotic emotions of Lin Shu as seen from the prefaces to his translation works[J].Journal of Fujian University of Technology;,2015,13(02):109.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-4348.2015.02.002]
[7]肖志兵.百年来林纾研究概况[J].福建理工大学学报,2015,13(02):113.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-4348.2015.02.003]
　Xiao Zhibing.A survey of a century long study on Lin Shu[J].Journal of Fujian University of Technology;,2015,13(02):113.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-4348.2015.02.003]
[8]张丽华,陈书羽.从《修身讲义》论林纾的教育理念与教学特色[J].福建理工大学学报,2016,14(02):103.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-4348.2016.02.001]
　Zhang Lihua,Chen Shuyu.Lin Shu’s educational concept and teaching features in his Teaching Notes of Cultivating Oneself[J].Journal of Fujian University of Technology;,2016,14(02):103.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-4348.2016.02.001]
[9]肖志兵.林纾与“学衡派”之关系考证[J].福建理工大学学报,2016,14(02):109.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-4348.2016.02.002]
　Xiao Zhibing.A textual research of the relation between Lin Shu and Xueheng School[J].Journal of Fujian University of Technology;,2016,14(02):109.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-4348.2016.02.002]
[10]王少羽.再论林纾谒陵[J].福建理工大学学报,2018,16(02):109.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-4348.2018.02.002]
　WANG Shaoyu.On Lin Shu’s visits to Emperor Guangxu’s Mausoleum[J].Journal of Fujian University of Technology;,2018,16(02):109.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-4348.2018.02.002]

更新日期/Last Update: 2024-04-25