[1]耿璐莹,臧万军,张丙强.衬砌背后空洞对浅埋隧道结构稳定性的影响[J].福建理工大学学报,2023,21(06):511-516.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-4348.2023.06.001]
　GENG Luying,ZANG Wanjun,ZHANG Bingqiang.Effect of voids behind lining on structural stability of shallow buried tunnels[J].Journal of Fujian University of Technology;,2023,21(06):511-516.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-4348.2023.06.001]
点击复制

衬砌背后空洞对浅埋隧道结构稳定性的影响()
分享到：

《福建理工大学学报》[ISSN:2097-3853/CN:35-1351/Z]

卷:
第21卷
期数:
2023年06期
页码:
511-516
栏目:
出版日期:
2023-12-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
Effect of voids behind lining on structural stability of shallow buried tunnels
作者:
耿璐莹; 臧万军; 张丙强
地下工程福建省高校重点实验室（福建理工大学）
Author(s):
GENG Luying;  ZANG Wanjun;  ZHANG Bingqiang
Key Laboratory of Underground Engineering in Colleges and Universities of Fujian Province
关键词:
空洞; 隧道; 稳定性; 衬砌
Keywords:
voids; tunnels; stability; lining
分类号:
U451
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1672-4348.2023.06.001
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
利用Abaqus 有限元软件进行三维弹塑性模拟分析,研究不同大小、不同位置的空洞对浅埋隧道衬砌结构变形、应力、安全系数以及围岩应力、压力的影响。结果表明:无论空洞在什么位置,围岩最大主应力一般随空洞增大而增大,最大变化幅度为69.1%;围岩压力的变化主要集中在空洞及周围,最大变化率可达90%,其他控制点处变化率不超1.5%;衬砌位移均随空洞增大而增大,其变化幅度由大到小依次为“ X>Y>Z”;衬砌最大主应力一般随空洞增大先减小后增大,变化幅度最大可达57.8%;衬砌安全系数随空洞增大而减小,拱脚处空洞出现最小值2.9。
Abstract:
Three-dimensional elastoplastic simulation analyses were conducted using Abaqus finite element software to investigate the effects of voids of different sizes and positions on the deformation, stress distribution, safety factor, as well as the stress and pressure in the surrounding rock for shallow-buried tunnel lining structures. Results indicate that, irrespective of the void’s location, the maximum principal stress in the surrounding rock generally increases with increasing void size, with a maximum variation of 69.1%. Pressure variations in the surrounding rock are primarily concentrated around the void and its vicinity, with a maximum variation rate of up to 90%, while at other control points, the variation rate does not exceed 1.5%. Lining displacements increase with the increase of voids, with the change magnitude in the order of “X>Y>Z”. The maximum principal stress in the lining structure typically decreases and then increases with increasing void size, with a maximum variation of 57.8%. The safety factor of the lining decreases with increasing void size, reaching a minimum value of 2.9 at the void near the arch foot.

参考文献/References:

［1］ 乐绍林,杨曦,曹华彰,等.衬砌空洞影响下公路隧道衬砌力学行为研究［J/OL］.施工技术(中英文) .http：∥kns.cnki.net/kcms2/detail/10.1768.TU.20230529.1315.006.html.［2］ 应国刚. 衬砌背后空洞对隧道结构体系安全性的影响机理研究［D］. 北京：北京交通大学，2016.［3］ 杨公标，张成平，蔡义，等. 考虑重力影响的含空洞地层浅埋隧道围岩应力及位移解析解［J］. 中国公路学报，2020，33（3）：119-131.［4］ 李思，卢锋，史锴然. 浅埋隧道偏压角度对背后空洞衬砌安全性的影响研究［J］. 公路，2019，64（3）：310-314.［5］ 张素磊，齐晓强，刘昌，等. 公路隧道衬砌背后空洞分布特征及其对衬砌结构的影响［J］. 建筑科学与工程学报，2020，37（2）：62-70.［6］ HE B G，LIU E R，ZHANG Z Q，et al. Failure modes of highway tunnel with voids behind the lining roof［J］. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology，2021，117：104147.［7］ 葛思敏，张旭. 衬砌背后空洞对不对称连拱隧道结构安全性影响分析［J］. 现代隧道技术，2022，59（S1）：90-99.［8］ 黄锋，刘星辰，金成昊，等. 衬砌背后空洞对隧道结构安全影响的模型试验研究［J］. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版），2020，39（3）：69-77.［9］ 交通运输部. 公路隧道设计规范 第一册 土建工程：JTG 3370.1—2018［S］. 北京：人民交通出版社，2019.

相似文献/References:

[1]吴波、吴兵兵.基于安全系数法地铁暗挖通道施工可靠性分析[J].福建理工大学学报,2021,19(04):322.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-4348.2021.04.003]
　WU Bo,WU Bingbing.Construction reliability analysis of underground tunnel based on safety factor method[J].Journal of Fujian University of Technology;,2021,19(06):322.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-4348.2021.04.003]
[2]黄志斌.移动荷载作用下跨越空洞加筋道路动力响应分析[J].福建理工大学学报,2024,22(03):219.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.2097-3853.2024.03.003]
　HUANG Zhibin.Dynamic response analysis of a geosynthetic-reinforced embankment overlying voids under traffic loads[J].Journal of Fujian University of Technology;,2024,22(06):219.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.2097-3853.2024.03.003]

更新日期/Last Update: 2023-12-25