[1]董思远.意定监护中律师主体地位研究[J].福建工程学院学报,2022,20(02):177-182.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-4348.2022.02.013]
 DONG Siyuan.Research on the status of lawyers in voluntary guardianship[J].Journal of FuJian University of Technology,2022,20(02):177-182.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-4348.2022.02.013]
点击复制

意定监护中律师主体地位研究()
分享到:

《福建工程学院学报》[ISSN:2097-3853/CN:35-1351/Z]

卷:
第20卷
期数:
2022年02期
页码:
177-182
栏目:
出版日期:
2022-04-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
Research on the status of lawyers in voluntary guardianship
作者:
董思远
福建工程学院法学院
Author(s):
DONG Siyuan
School of Law, Fujian University of Technology
关键词:
意定监护律师主体地位
Keywords:
voluntary guardianship lawyers subject status
分类号:
D913.9
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1672-4348.2022.02.013
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
为了解我国律师实践意定监护制度的情况,对我国开展该业务的部分家事律师进行了调研,结合国外经验,得出结论:法律专业背景有助于律师开展有效监督,加之收费方式与标准灵活,默认其作为监督人可避免受托人产生抵触心理;采用律师与其他监护人共同监护、各司其职的方式可大大增强其担任意定监护人的可行性。律师作为监护监督人或意定监护人不存在法理及实践操作的障碍。
Abstract:
In order to investigate the practice of voluntary guardianship system by Chinese lawyers, interviews were conducted with some of the lawyers who carried out this business in China. Based on the study of foreign experience, conclusions were drawn: The legal professional background helps lawyers to carry out effective supervision, and their charging method and standards are flexible. Thus, tacit recognition of such a lawyer as a supervisor can avoid resistance of the trustee; the adoption of a joint guardianship between a lawyer and other guardians performing their duties respectively can greatly enhance the feasibility of lawyer serving as an voluntary guardian. For this reason, the main status of lawyers as guardianship supervisors or voluntary guardians does not have legal and practical obstacles.

参考文献/References:

[1] 陈苇,李欣. 私法自治、国家义务与社会责任: 成年监护制度的立法趋势与中国启示[J]. 学术界, 2012(1):182. [2] 李欣. 私法自治视域下的老年人监护制度研究[D]. 重庆:西南政法大学, 2012:154. [3] 李霞. 意定监护制度论纲[J]. 法学, 2011(4):123. [4] 王琪鹏. “社工家人”让老人有了主心骨儿[N]. 北京晚报, 2021-02-22(10).[5] 金光寛之. 財産管理の視点から:成年後見制度の現状と課題[J]. 法政論叢. 2017(1):293.[6] 瑞士民法典[M]. 于海涌, 赵希璇, 译. 北京:法律出版社, 2016:160. [7] 李霞. 成年监护制度研究[D]. 济南:山东大学, 2007:179. [8] 刘建. 民法视域下的成年监护制度研究[D]. 北京:中央财经大学, 2017:11. [9] 董思远. 我国职业监护人制度立法研究: 兼以日本职业“后见人”制度为学术视点[J]. 福建江夏学院学报, 2020, 10(1):58.

更新日期/Last Update: 2022-04-25