[1]刘如月、薛潘荣、颜桂云.带可恢复功能节点的装配式框架结构抗震性能[J].福建工程学院学报,2020,18(06):553-559.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-4348.2020.06.008]
　LIU Ruyue,XUE Panrong,YAN Guiyun.Seismic behavior of prefabricated frame structures with earthquake-resilient joints[J].Journal of FuJian University of Technology,2020,18(06):553-559.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-4348.2020.06.008]
点击复制

带可恢复功能节点的装配式框架结构抗震性能()
分享到：

《福建工程学院学报》[ISSN:2097-3853/CN:35-1351/Z]

卷:
第18卷
期数:
2020年06期
页码:
553-559
栏目:
出版日期:
2020-12-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
Seismic behavior of prefabricated frame structures with earthquake-resilient joints
作者:
刘如月、薛潘荣、颜桂云
福建工程学院土木工程学院（福建省土木工程新技术与信息化重点实验室）
Author(s):
LIU Ruyue1; 2;  XUE Panrong1; 2;  YAN Guiyun
Fujian Provincial Key laboratory of Advanced Technology and Information in Civil Engineering
关键词:
功能可恢复节点; 装配式框架; 可更换耗能铰; 损伤可控; 抗震性能
Keywords:
earthquake-resilient joint;  prefabricated frame structure;  replaceable energy-dissipation hinge;  damage-controllability;  seismic behavior
分类号:
TU391
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1672-4348.2020.06.008
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
为实现装配式结构震损后能快速修复以恢复使用功能，提出一种带可恢复功能节点的装配式框架结构体系。利用ABAQUS 有限元软件对可恢复功能节点进行数值模拟，探讨可恢复功能节点的作用机理，并将可恢复功能节点布置到装配式框架结构中形成可恢复功能装配式框架结构，考察整体结构的受力机理，可更换耗能铰、装配式节点核心区与梁柱部件的失效演化规律。结果表明，节点的失效主要是由于可恢复功能节点在削弱钢板处的损伤累积引起的断裂导致?与现浇混凝土框架及节点加强型现浇混凝土框架相比，可恢复功能装配式框架的承载能力更高、延性更好，通过可更换耗能铰的塑性变形耗散能量大幅度提高了结构的耗能能力，且结构的损伤破坏集中在削弱钢板上，有效地避免了预制梁柱和节点核心区的损伤。震后通过更换损伤耗能元件即可恢复结构的使用功能，实现了损伤可控和震后功能可恢复的抗震设防理念，具有广泛的应用前景。
Abstract:
To realize the quick repair and earthquake resilience of the prefabricated structure after earthquake, the prefabricated frame structural system with replaceable earthquake-resilient joints was proposed. Numerical simulation was carried out by using ABAQUS to explore the mechanism of the earthquake-resilience joints. The replaceable earthquake-resilient joints were arranged in the assembly frame structure to form an earthquake-resilient frame structure. The mechanical mechanism of the whole structure was investigated, as well as the failure evolution law of the energy-dissipation hinges, the core area of the assembly joint and the framing components. Research results show that the failure of the joints was largely due to the fracture caused by the damage accumulation at the weakened steel plate. Compared with the cast-in-place concrete frame structure and cast-in-place concrete structure with strengthened joints, the earthquake-resilient prefabricated frame structure developed higher bearing capacity and better ductility, and the energy-dissipation capacity of the structure was enhanced greatly by the plastic deformation of the replaceable energy dissipation hinges. The structural damage was concentrated on the weakened steel plates, which effectively helped avoid the damage on the prefabricated beam-columns and core joints, and the seismic performance could be restored by replacing the damaged members. The prefabricated frame structural system with replaceable earthquake-resilient joints achieve the objective of damage controllability and earthquake resilience.

参考文献/References:

[1] 孙岩波, 李晨光, 杨旭. 装配式混凝土框架结构梁-板-柱节点抗震性能试验研究[J]. 建筑结构, 2018, 48(7): 23-26. [2] 赵斌, 吕西林, 刘海峰. 预制高强混凝土结构后浇整体式梁柱组合件抗震性能试验研究[J]. 建筑结构学报, 2004, 25(6): 22-28. [3] 陈适才, 闫维明, 王文明, 等. 大型预制混凝土结构梁-柱-叠合板边节点抗震性能研究[J]. 建筑结构学报, 2011, 32(6): 60-67. [4] 潘鹏, 王海深, 郭海山, 等. 后张无黏结预应力干式连接梁柱节点抗震性能试验研究[J]. 建筑结构学报, 2018, 39(10): 46-55. [5] 李祚华, 彭志涵, 齐一鹤, 等. 装配式RC梁柱塑性可控钢质节点抗震性能足尺试验研究[J]. 建筑结构学报, 2019, 40(10): 43-50. [6] 吴从晓, 赖伟山, 周云, 等. 新型预制装配式消能减震混凝土框架节点抗震性能试验研究[J]. 土木工程报, 2015, 48(9): 23-30. [7] 赵均海, 胡壹, 张冬芳, 等. 装配式式钢管混凝土柱-钢梁框架抗震性能试验研究[J]. 建筑结构学报, 2020, 41(8): 88-96. [8] 操礼林, 郭良梦, 于国军, 等. 新型外筒式梁柱装配节点的抗震性能研究[J]. 应用基础与工程科学学报, 2019, 27(6): 1399-1410. [9] 姜子钦, 杨晓峰, 张爱林, 等. 可恢复功能装配式中柱节点耗能装置试验研究[J]. 建筑结构学报, 2020, 41(1): 15-23. [10] 李哲明, 吴从晓, 黄青青, 等. 装配式混凝土金属消能减震连接体系抗震性能分析研究[J]. 地震工程学报, 2019, 41(3): 679-687. [11] NZABONIMPA J, HONG W, KIM J. Experimental and non-linear numerical investigation of the novel detachable mechanical joints with laminated plates for composite precast beam-column joint [J]. Composite Structures, 2018, 185: 286-303. [12] GHAVEBH H, RAZAK H, RAMLI SULONG N. Seismic performance of innovative hybrid precast reinforced concrete beam-to-column connections [J]. Engineering Structures 2020(202): 109 886. [13] NAKAKI S, ENGLEKIRK R, PLAEHN J. Ductile connectors for a precast concrete frame [J]. PCI Journal, 1994, 39(5): 46-59. [14] MORGEN B, KURAMA Y. A friction damper for post-tensioned precast concrete beam-to-column joints[C]∥13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, 2004: 3189. [15] SONG L, GUO T, CAO Z. Seismic response of self-centering prestressed concrete moment resisting frames with web friction devices[J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2015, 71: 151-162. [16] ANINTHANENI P, DHAKAL R, MARSHALL J, et al. Nonlinear cyclic behavior of precast concrete frame sub-assemblies with “dry” end plate connection[J]. Structures, 2018, 14: 124-136. [17] 薛潘荣. 可恢复功能装配式混凝土节点及其框架结构抗震性能研究[D]. 福州: 福建工程学院, 2020. [18] 韩林海. 钢管混凝土结构: 理论与实践[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2016.

更新日期/Last Update: 2020-12-25