[1]韩荣和.精神权利法表现形式比较研究——以民法、著作权法的联系与区别为视角[J].福建工程学院学报,2020,18(02):157-163.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-4348.2020.02.010]
　HAN Ronghe.A comparative study of the forms of expression of the law of spiritual rights：from the perspective of the connection and distinction between civil law and copyright law[J].Journal of FuJian University of Technology,2020,18(02):157-163.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-4348.2020.02.010]
点击复制

精神权利法表现形式比较研究——以民法、著作权法的联系与区别为视角()
分享到：

《福建工程学院学报》[ISSN:2097-3853/CN:35-1351/Z]

卷:
第18卷
期数:
2020年02期
页码:
157-163
栏目:
出版日期:
2020-04-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
A comparative study of the forms of expression of the law of spiritual rights：from the perspective of the connection and distinction between civil law and copyright law
作者:
韩荣和
福建工程学院法学院
Author(s):
HAN Ronghe
Law School, Fujian University of Technology
关键词:
精神权利法; 表现形式; 联系; 区别
Keywords:
law of spiritual rights;  forms of expression;  connection;  distinction
分类号:
D913
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1672-4348.2020.02.010
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
作为大课题的“精神权利法”，目前存在着民法、著作权法两种法律制度形式，不同国家民法典采取“合二而一”与“一分为二”的处理模式。它们之间主要通过“人格权”“精神属性”等连接点建立联系，又在定义与范畴、主体与客体、确定性与从属性等多个方面有所区别。通过比较看出，从理论或制度层面确立民法中精神权利制度的法律意义和价值更大，更能全面保护人的精神利益。
Abstract:
At present, there are two legal forms of the “spiritual rights law” as a major topic: the civil law and the copyright law. Civil codes of different countries adopt either the mode of “combining two into one” or that of “dividing one into two”. They are mainly connected through such points as “personality right” and “spiritual attribute”, and the differences between them are reflected in definition and category, subject and object, certainty and subordination. Through comparison, it is clear that the legal significance and value of establishing the system of spiritual rights in civil law from the theoretical or institutional level is greater, and it can protect people’s spiritual interests in an all-round way.

参考文献/References:

[1] H.C.马列英. 民法发展的趋势[M]. 外国民法资料选编. 北京: 法律出版社, 1983: 171.[2] 徐国栋. 绿色民法典草案[M]. 北京: 社会科学文献出版社, 2004: 2.[3] 陈健. 质疑精神权利: 作者精神权利制度存在的问题及其完善[J]. 中国政法大学学报, 2015(5): 5-19, 157. [4] BIRD R C. Moral rights: diagnosis and rehabilitation[J]. American Business Law Journal, 2009, 46(3): 407-452. [5] M·雷炳德. 著作权法[M]. 张恩民, 译. 北京: 法律出版社, 2005: 24.[6] 麻昌华. 论精神权利制度[J]. 中南政法学院学报, 1992, 9(2): 50-56. [7] 关今华. 精神损害赔偿实务[M]. 北京: 人民法院出版社, 1992: 2.[8] 马骏驹, 刘卉. 论法律人格内涵的变迁和人格权的发展: 从民法中的人出发[J]. 法学评论, 2002, 20(1): 26-41. [9] 徐国栋. 民法对象研究[M]. 北京: 法律出版社, 2014: 272.[10] ADLER A. Against moral rights[J]. California Law Review, 2009, 97(1):263-300.[11] DWORKIN G. The moral right of the author: moral rights and the common law countries[J]. Columbia-VLA Journal of Law & the Arts, Spring/Summer, 1995.[12] 郑成思. 有关作者精神权利的几个理论问题[J]. 中国法学, 1990(3): 71-78. [13] 杨立新, 林旭霞. 论人格标识商品化权及其民法保护[J]. 福建师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2006(1): 74-80.

更新日期/Last Update: 2019-04-25