[1]应华山,苏华,黄文金,等.钢管高性能混凝土界面黏结性能试验[J].福建工程学院学报,2022,20(04):340-345.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-4348.2022.04.006]
　YING Huashan,SU Hua,HUANG Wenjin,et al.Interfacial bonding property test of high performance concrete-filled steel tube[J].Journal of FuJian University of Technology,2022,20(04):340-345.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-4348.2022.04.006]
点击复制

钢管高性能混凝土界面黏结性能试验()
分享到：

《福建工程学院学报》[ISSN:2097-3853/CN:35-1351/Z]

卷:
第20卷
期数:
2022年04期
页码:
340-345
栏目:
出版日期:
2022-08-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
Interfacial bonding property test of high performance concrete-filled steel tube
作者:
应华山; 苏华; 黄文金; 张荣清; 尹秋雨
福建农林大学
Author(s):
YING Huashan;  SU Hua;  HUANG Wenjin;  ZHANG Rongqing;  YIN Qiuyu
College of Transportation and Civil Engineering, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University
关键词:
界面作用; 钢管壁厚; 截面形式; 表面粗糙度; 推出试验
Keywords:
interfacial interaction;  steel tube wall thickness;  section of steel tube;  surface roughness;  push-out tests
分类号:
TU398
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1672-4348.2022.04.006
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
为研究钢管高性能混凝土界面黏结性能，进行了包括钢管壁厚、截面形式、钢材类型和钢管内表面状态4 个参数的推出试验研究，分析了试件的试验现象、荷载-滑移曲线和界面黏结强度。 结果表明，仅当试件壁厚较薄时，钢管中下部会出现45°剪切滑移线；不同钢管壁厚试件的荷载-滑移曲线共有3 种增长模式，均包括胶结滑移段、滑移段和摩阻段3 个阶段；增大钢管壁厚、使钢管内表面锈蚀可以提高界面黏结强度；采用方形钢管代替圆形钢管、不锈钢管代替普通钢管对界面黏结强度有不利影响。
Abstract:
In order to study the interfacial bonding property of high performance concrete-filled steel tube, a series of push-out tests were carried out. Wall thickness, section shape, type of steel and internal surface state of steel tube were chosen for contrast parameters. By investigating the test phenomena, mode of load-slip curves and interfacial bonding strength, it was found that shear yield line with an angle of 45° will appear in the middle and lower parts of the steel tube only when tube wall thickness of specimens was small. The load-slip curves of specimens with different wall thicknesses have three growth modes, but all include cementation slip stage, slip stage and friction stage. By increasing the wall thickness and rusting the inner surface of steel tube, the interfacial bonding strength can be increased. Replacing circular steel tube with square steel tube and replacing ordinary steel tube with stainless steel tube have adverse effects on the interfacial bonding strength.

参考文献/References:

[1] HUANG W J, ZHANG Z B, HUANG Q W, et al. Experimental study on mechanical properties of RPC-FST under direct tension load[C]// Shi C, Wang D. 1st International Conference on UHPC Materials and Structure. Changsha, China: RILEM Publications SARL, 2016: 236-246.[2] LAI Z C, YAO P Y, HUANG W J, et al. Reactive Powder concrete-filled steel tube (RPCFT) members subjected to axial tension: experimental study and design[J]. Structures, 2020, 28: 933-942. [3] 闫志刚, 安明喆, 吴捧捧, 等. 钢管活性粉末混凝土界面粘结强度试验研究[J]. 中国铁道科学, 2009, 30（6）: 7-11.[4] 张正宾. 钢管RPC界面作用试验研究[D]. 福州: 福建农林大学, 2017.[5] 黄文金, 盛叶, 张正宾, 等. 钢管-钢纤维活性粉末混凝土界面黏结强度试验研究[J]. 建筑结构学报. 2017, 38(S1): 502-507.[6] 魏科丰, 贾善坡, 高源. 钢管RPC界面粘结强度试验研究[J]. 建筑结构, 2019, 49（22）: 101-107.[7] 王秋维, 史庆轩, 徐赵东, 等. 圆钢管活性粉末混凝土界面黏结性能[J]. 建筑结构学报, 2021, 42（12）: 210-218.[8] 中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部. 钢管混凝土结构技术规范: GB 50936—2014[S]. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 2014.[9] 国家市场监督管理总局, 国家标准化管理委员会. 金属材料 拉伸试验 第1部分: 室温试验方法: GB/T 228.1—2021[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2021.[10] 国家质量监督检验检疫总局, 中国国家标准化管理委员会. 活性粉末混凝土: GB/T 31387—2015[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2015.[11] LYU W Q, HAN L H. Investigation on bond strength between recycled aggregate concrete (RAC) and steel tube in RAC-filled steel tubes[J]. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2019, 155: 438-459.[12] TAO Z, SONG T Y, UY B, et al. Bond behavior in concrete-filled steel tubes[J]. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2016, 120: 81-93.

更新日期/Last Update: 2022-08-25