[1]林小英,王鑫,刘学平.某城区挥发性有机物的臭氧生成潜势及源解析[J].福建工程学院学报,2022,20(01):74-77+102.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-4348.2022.01.012]
　LIN Xiaoying,WANG Xin,LIU Xueping.Ozone generation potential and source analysis of volatile organic compounds in an urban area[J].Journal of FuJian University of Technology,2022,20(01):74-77+102.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-4348.2022.01.012]
点击复制

某城区挥发性有机物的臭氧生成潜势及源解析()
分享到：

《福建工程学院学报》[ISSN:2097-3853/CN:35-1351/Z]

卷:
第20卷
期数:
2022年01期
页码:
74-77+102
栏目:
出版日期:
2022-02-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
Ozone generation potential and source analysis of volatile organic compounds in an urban area
作者:
林小英; 王鑫; 刘学平
福建工程学院生态环境与城市建设学院
Author(s):
LIN Xiaoying;  WANG Xin;  LIU Xueping
School of Ecological Environment and Urban Construction, Fujian University of Technology
关键词:
挥发性有机物; 臭氧; 潜势分析; 源解析
Keywords:
volatile organic compounds;  O3;  potential analysis;  source analysis
分类号:
X511
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1672-4348.2022.01.012
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
基于福建省某市大气挥发性有机物的观测数据，分析其挥发性有机物的污染特征，研究臭氧(O3)生成潜势，采用正矩阵因子分解法(PMF)模型开展源解析。本次研究共检测出化合物115种，定量分析51种挥发性有机物，包括烷烃、烯烃以及芳香烃，其中烷烃和芳香烃含量最高，烯烃的O3生成潜势贡献最大(45%)。PMF模型源解析结果表明，挥发性有机物主要排放源包括机动车尾气排放、溶剂使用、植物源、生物质燃烧和工业过程，分别占比55.07%、9.37%、8.09%、12.01%和15.47%。
Abstract:
Based on the observational data of the atmospheric volatile organic compounds in a city in Fujian Province, this study analyzed the pollution characteristics of volatile organic compounds, studied theO3 generation potential, and used the PMF model for source analysis. A total of 115 compounds were detected and 51 volatile organic compounds were quantitatively analyzed, including alkanes, alkenes and aromatic hydrocarbons, among which alkanes and aromatic hydrocarbons have the highest content. Olefins contributes the most (45%) to theO3 formation potential. PMF model source analysis results show that the main emission sources of volatile organic compounds include vehicle exhaust emissions, solvent use, plant sources, biomass combustion and industrial processes, accounting for 55.07%, 9.37%, 8.09%, 12.01% and 15.47% respectively.

参考文献/References:

[1] 谢祖欣, 冯宏芳, 林文, 等. 气象条件对福州市夏季臭氧（O3）浓度的影响研究[J]. 生态环境学报, 2020, 29（11）：2251-2261.[2] QU Y W, WANG T J, CAI Y F, et al. Influence of atmospheric particulate matter on ozone in Nanjing, China：observational study and mechanistic analysis[J]. Advances in Atmospheric Sciences, 2018, 35（11）：1381-1395.[3] 库盈盈, 任万辉, 苏枞枞, 等. 沈阳市不同功能区挥发性有机物分布特征及臭氧生成潜势[J]. 环境科学, 2021, 42（11）：5201-5209.[4] 张夏夏, 袁自冰, 郑君瑜, 等. 大气污染物监测数据不确定度评估方法体系建立及其对PMF源解析的影响分析[J]. 环境科学学报, 2019, 39（1）：95-104.[5] 徐慧, 张晗, 邢振雨, 等. 厦门冬春季大气VOCs的污染特征及臭氧生成潜势[J]. 环境科学, 2015, 36（1）：11-17.[6] LIU Y F, KONG L W, LIU X G, et al. Characteristics, secondary transformation, and health risk assessment of ambient volatile organic compounds （VOCs） in urban Beijing, China[J]. Atmospheric Pollution Research, 2021, 12（3）：33-46.[7] FAN M Y, ZHANG Y L, LIN Y C, et al. Source apportionments of atmospheric volatile organic compounds in Nanjing, China during high ozone pollution season[J]. Chemosphere, 2021, 263：128025.[8] 王倩. 2019年5月上海复合污染过程中挥发性有机物的污染特征及来源[J]. 环境科学, 2020, 41（6）：2555-2564. [9] SUN J, SHEN Z X, ZHANG Y, et al. Urban VOC profiles, possible sources, and its role in ozone formation for a summer campaign over Xi’an, China[J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2019, 26（27）：27769-27782.[10] 林理量, 程勇, 曹礼明, 等. 深圳臭氧污染日的VOCs组成与来源特征[J]. 中国环境科学, 2021, 41（8）：3484-3492.

更新日期/Last Update: 2022-02-25