[1]曹阳,刘国买,林鸿涛.基于组织与人因分析系统的塔吊事故分析[J].福建工程学院学报,2022,20(03):225-231.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-4348.2022.03.004]
 CAO Yang,LIU Guomai,LIN Hongtao.Tower crane accident analysis based on organization and human factor analysis system[J].Journal of FuJian University of Technology,2022,20(03):225-231.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-4348.2022.03.004]
点击复制

基于组织与人因分析系统的塔吊事故分析()
分享到:

《福建工程学院学报》[ISSN:2097-3853/CN:35-1351/Z]

卷:
第20卷
期数:
2022年03期
页码:
225-231
栏目:
出版日期:
2022-06-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
Tower crane accident analysis based on organization and human factor analysis system
作者:
曹阳刘国买林鸿涛
福建工程学院管理学院
Author(s):
CAO Yang LIU Guomai LIN Hongtao
School of Civil Engineering, Fujian University of Technology
关键词:
塔吊安全人因分析系统组织事故致因
Keywords:
tower crane safety human factor analysis system organization accidents causes
分类号:
X947
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1672-4348.2022.03.004
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
人因分析系统将事故致因简化为潜在因素作用于个人不安全行为,个人不安全行为导致事故发生。根据塔吊事故特点,构建组织与人因分析系统,其作用机制为潜在因素作用于个人不安全行为和组织不合理决策,组织不合理决策和个人不安全行为作用于事故。结果表明:塔吊事故主要有3类作用机制,其中安全文化、个人状态和班组状态对事故的影响最大。针对事故作用机制和作用强度,从组织和个人两个方面提出相应对策与建议。
Abstract:
The human factor analysis system simplifies the causes of accidents to potential factors acting on personal unsafe behaviors, and personal unsafe behaviors lead to accidents. Combined with the characteristics of tower crane accidents, an organization and human factor analysis system was proposed. Its mechanism is that potential factors act on personal unsafe behaviors and unreasonable organizational decisions, and then the two act on accidents. Results show that there are three main types of action mechanisms in tower crane accidents. Safety culture, personal status and team status have the greatest impact on accidents. In view of the mechanism and impact intensity of the accident, corresponding countermeasures and suggestions are put forward from both organizational and personal aspects.

参考文献/References:

[1] 2018年中国塔吊行业市场现状及发展趋势分析 海外市场逐渐成为发展新机遇点[EB/OL]. [2019-04-25].https:∥bg.qianzhan.com/report/detail/459/190425-88aa7b79.html.[2] 刘晨, 孙世梅, 赵寅杰, 等. 2016—2020年建筑塔式起重机事故统计分析[J]. 工业安全与环保, 2022, 48(3); 53-55, 63. [3] TAM V. Tower crane safety in the construction industry; a Hong Kong study[J]. Safety Science, 2011, 49(2); 208-215.[4] SHIN I J. Factors that affect safety of tower crane installation/dismantling in construction industry[J]. Safety Science, 2015, 72; 379-390. [5] 黄莺, 瑚珊, 姚思梦. 施工塔吊安全管理的系统动力学分析[J]. 安全与环境学报, 2020, 20(6); 2060-2068. [6] 沈中芹, 曾旺, 王瑞强, 等. 基于改进HFACS-MI模型的煤矿透水事故致因分析[J]. 安全与环境工程, 2020, 27(3); 178-184.[7] SWUSTE P. A ‘normal accident’ with a tower crane?An accident analysis conducted by the Dutch Safety Board[J]. Safety Science, 2013, 57; 276-282. [8] 毕节市七星关区天河广场项目“7.2”塔吊倒塌较大事故调查报告[EB/OL]. [2018-09-25]. https:∥www.bijie.gov.cn/bm/bjsyjglj/gk_5127035/zhsgjy_5127051/201809/t20180925_67557043.html.[9] ZHOU W, ZHAO T S, LIU W, et al. Tower crane safety on construction sites; a complex sociotechnical system perspective[J]. Safety Science, 2018, 109; 95-108. [10] 赵挺生, 周炜, 徐凯, 等. 塔吊使用阶段安全风险分析与贝叶斯建模[J]. 科学技术与工程, 2019, 19(11); 350-356. [11] 张伟, 张潇, 薛楠楠, 等. 塔吊安全事故致因网络模型构建与分析[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2020, 30(12); 1-7.

更新日期/Last Update: 2022-06-25