[1]李明,吴波,张焕明,等.基于Monte Carlo模拟的软土基坑隆起风险评估研究[J].福建工程学院学报,2018,16(06):541-546.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-4348.2018.06.007]
　LI Ming,WU Bo,ZHANG Huanming,et al.Analysis of soft soil foundation pit heave based on Monte Carlo simulation[J].Journal of FuJian University of Technology,2018,16(06):541-546.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-4348.2018.06.007]
点击复制

基于Monte Carlo模拟的软土基坑隆起风险评估研究()
分享到：

《福建工程学院学报》[ISSN:2097-3853/CN:35-1351/Z]

卷:
第16卷
期数:
2018年06期
页码:
541-546
栏目:
出版日期:
2018-12-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
Analysis of soft soil foundation pit heave based on Monte Carlo simulation
作者:
李明; 吴波; 张焕明; 周鹏
福建工程学院土木工程学院
Author(s):
LI Ming;  WU Bo;  ZHANG Huanming;  ZHOU Peng
School of Civil Engineering, Fujian University of Technology
关键词:
Monte Carlo模拟方法; 基坑隆起; 圆弧滑动; 风险评估
Keywords:
Monte Carlo simulation method;  foundation pit heave;  circular arc sliding;  risk assessment
分类号:
TU447
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1672-4348.2018.06.007
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
基于圆弧滑动模型确定的安全系数，将基坑隆起破坏的不利事件划分为5种情况，利用Monte Carlo模拟确定不利事件发生概率，提出了考虑基坑隆起破坏引起的不利事件发生概率及经济损失的风险评估模型。将所提方法应用于福州地铁2号线某基坑工程中，结果表明，当围护结构插入比小于1.2时，加固对基坑隆起破坏损失期望减小效果显著；当围护结构插入比大于1.2时，加固对基坑隆起破坏损失期望减小效果一般；当插入比小于0.8时，基坑隆起破坏的损失期望等级属于“严重”；当插入比介于0.8～1.2时，基坑隆起破坏的损失期望等级属于“需要考虑”；当插入比大于1.2时，基坑隆起破坏的损失期望等级属于“可忽略”。
Abstract:
The adverse events of foundation pit heave were divided into five cases based on the safety factor of circular arc-sliding model. The probability of adverse events was determined by Monte Carlo simulation. A risk assessment model considering the probability and economic loss of adverse events caused by foundation pit heave was put forward. The proposed method was applied to a foundation pit of Fuzhou Metro Line NO. 2. Results show that the reducing effect of reinforcement on foundation pit heave’s loss expectation is remarkable when the insertion ratio of the enclosure structure is less than 1.2. The effect of reinforcement on the loss expectation of foundation pit heave is generally reduced when the insertion ratio of enclosure structure is greater than 1.2. When the insertion ratio is less than 0.8, the loss expectation grade of foundation pit uplift damage is "serious". When it is between 0.8 and 1.2, the loss expectation grade of foundation pit uplift is “consideration needed”. When it is greater than 1.2, the loss expectation grade of foundation pit uplift is “negligible”.

参考文献/References:

[1] 周红波, 蔡来炳, 高文杰. 城市轨道交通车站基坑事故统计分析[J]. 水文地质工程地质, 2009, 36(2): 67.
[2] 黄茂松, 秦会来. 基坑抗隆起稳定分析的现状与进展[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2008, 30(S1): 182-186.
[3] 唐雨耕. 黏土层基坑工程隆起分析之可靠度评估[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2010, 32(S2): 586-589.
[4] 尹小涛, 王水林. 基于可靠度理论的滑坡稳定性及其影响因素分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2008, 29(6): 1551-1556.
[5] 张继周, 缪林昌. 岩土参数概率分布类型及其选择标准[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2009, 28(S2): 3526-3532.
[6] 王洪新, 陈建军, 刘冀山. 基坑抗隆起稳定安全系数实用计算分析与应用[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2007(S1): 3223-3230.
[7] 傅旭东, 赵善锐. 用蒙特卡洛(Monte-Carlo)方法计算岩土工程的可靠度指标[J]. 西南交通大学学报, 1996(2): 164-168.
[8] 黄建华, 杨思, 吴波. 基于贝叶斯网络的基坑围护工程施工风险评估[J]. 武汉大学学报(工学版), 2016, 49(5): 733-739.
[9] 上海市勘察设计协会. 基坑工程设计规程： DBJ08-61-97[S]. 上海： 上海市建筑建材市场管理总站, 1997.
[10] 中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部. 城市轨道交通地下工程建设风险管理规范： GB50652-2011[S]. 北京： 中国建筑工业出版社, 2011.

更新日期/Last Update: 2018-12-25