[1]姜跃,郑莉.公平偏好对供应链减排决策的影响研究[J].福建工程学院学报,2018,16(04):396-401.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-4348.2018.04.018]
 JIANG Yue,ZHENG Li.Research on the impacts of fairness preference on the decision-making of carbon emission reduction of the supply chain[J].Journal of FuJian University of Technology,2018,16(04):396-401.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-4348.2018.04.018]
点击复制

公平偏好对供应链减排决策的影响研究()
分享到:

《福建工程学院学报》[ISSN:2097-3853/CN:35-1351/Z]

卷:
第16卷
期数:
2018年04期
页码:
396-401
栏目:
出版日期:
2018-08-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
Research on the impacts of fairness preference on the decision-making of carbon emission reduction of the supply chain
作者:
姜跃郑莉
福建工程学院管理学院
Author(s):
JIANG Yue ZHENG Li
School of Management, Fujian University of Technology
关键词:
公平偏好 碳税 减排 供应链
Keywords:
fairness preference carbon tax carbon emission reduction supply chain
分类号:
F124.5; F224
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1672-4348.2018.04.018
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
研究制造商具有公平偏好,零售商无公平偏好;制造商无公平偏好、零售商具有公平偏好和制造商与零售商都具有公平偏好3种情况下的供应链减排决策,研究表明随着公平偏好的不断上升,供应链减排量不断下降,同时还发现公平偏好会影响碳税的减排效果。
Abstract:
Decision-making of reducing carbon emissions was researched in three cases: the manufacturer has fairness preference, while the retailer does not; the manufacturer does not have fairness preference, while the retailer does; the manufacturer and retailer both have fairness preference. Results show that the volume of emission reduction in the supply chain decreases with the increasing of fairness preference, and fairness preference has certain impacts on the effect of carbon tax on emission reduction.

参考文献/References:

[1] JI J, ZHANG Z, YANG L. Carbon emission reduction decisions in the retail-dual-channel supply chain with consumers’ preference[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2017, 141: 852-867.
[2] IPCC. IPCC guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories[S]. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press, 2006.
[3] DU S, ZHU L, LIANG L. Emission-dependent supply chain and environment-policy-making in the ‘cap-and-trade’ system[J]. Energy Policy, 2013, 57(C): 61-67.
[4] BENJAAFAR S, LI Y, DASKIN M. Carbon footprint and the management of supply chains: insights from simple models[J]. IEEE Transactions on Automation Science & Engineering, 2012, 10(1): 99-116.
[5] 姜跃, 韩水华. 碳税规制下供应商参与对企业减排决策的影响分析[J]. 软科学, 2016, 30(6): 43-48.
[6] 姜跃, 韩水华. 碳税规制下零售商减排成本分担对企业减排决策的影响[J]. 商业研究, 2017, 59(8): 158-166.
[7] 赵道致, 徐春秋, 王芹鹏. 考虑零售商竞争的联合减排与低碳宣传微分对策[J]. 控制与决策, 2014(10): 1809-1815.
[8] 杜少甫, 朱贾昂, 高冬, 等. Nash讨价还价公平参考下的供应链优化决策[J]. 管理科学学报, 2013, 16(3): 68-72.
[9] CUI T H, RAJU J S, ZHANG Z J, et al. Fairness and channel coordination[J]. Management Science, 2007, 53(8): 1304-1314.
[10] CALISKAN-DEMIRAG O, CHEN Y, LI J. Channel coordination under fairness concerns and nonlinear demand[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2010, 207(3): 1321-1326.
[11] 王磊, 戴更新, 孙浩. 零售商提供服务且具有公平偏好的供应链博弈研究[J]. 系统工程, 2015(6): 1-9.
[12] 唐飞, 许茂增. 基于公平偏好的双渠道闭环供应链定价决策[J]. 系统工程, 2017(4): 110-115.
[13] 邢伟, 汪寿阳, 赵秋红, 等. 考虑渠道公平的双渠道供应链均衡策略[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2011, 31(7): 1249-1256.
[14] 张克勇, 侯世旺, 周国华. 公平关切下闭环供应链定价策略[J]. 系统管理学报, 2013, 22(6): 841-849.
[15] 丁雪峰, 魏芳芳. 公平关切下制造商主导的闭环供应链定价策略[J]. 工业工程, 2014(4): 78-84.

更新日期/Last Update: 2018-08-25